Luka (lukadia) wrote in elfwood_wank,
Luka
lukadia
elfwood_wank

...

MY BUNNIES KILLED AN ENTIRE COMMUNITY.

Your message submitted to the moderated community elfwoodrant has been rejected by a moderator of that community.

Please note that replies to this email are not sent to the community's moderator(s). If you would like to discuss the reasons for your entry's rejection, you will need to contact a moderator directly.

This is the message you submitted:

Time: 2005-08-31 13:28
Subject: Happy thoughts, people. HAPPY THOUGHTS!
Picture Keyword: red hot cock
Text:

I was going to post a rant about how having a new rule that forbids anything more than 'occasional' sarcasm in a rant journal is the best doublethink ever, especially when no one has explained how exactly future sarcasm will be measured, or at what point the level of sarcasm warrants deletion of a comment or entry.

But I didn't want it to get deleted, so I decided to post this instead:

(IMAGE OF CUTE BUNNIES REMOVED DUE TO CONTROVERSY)

I hope it doesn't make anyone mad, or start any controversy, or cause Elfwood to look bad or anything. I want people to like me, and think happy thoughts, and for there to never be disagreement.

PS - Sarcastic comments may be deleted on sight (not by me!), so please don't leave any. Keep it friendly and polite okay people?

After all, this is a rant journal.


-------------

This was a repost of a rant that was baleeted (No given reason, but I suspect the excuse was the small photograph of cute bunnies image I failed to LJ-cut in accordance with the rules). The community mods then decided to moderate submissions to avoid future bunnies unpleasantness.

I reposted the rant without the bunnies rulebreaking content, but it was rejected (as I suspected, Flopsy and Mopsy were just patsies!).


Howell's submitted rant on the moderation rule:

Okay you guys do realize that in a RANT JOURNAL, right? It is wishful thinking if you want people to be polite and kind around here. I'm sorry that your denial has led to the unnecessary deletion and censoring of people who were merely expressing their opinions on this matter. A matter in which you are, quite frankly, in the wrong.

I think you need to keep in mind that if you post in this journal, you have to be prepared for the replies. MODERATORS NOT EXCEPTED. Shutting people up just because you don't like what they had to say is an abuse of your moderating power. Any OTHER user who had done this would be ridiculed and verbally beaten to a pulp over crap like that. WHICH IS HOW IT OUGHT TO BE.

Now, when you close the rant journal and accept only nice-nice into the regular elfwood LJ, THEN what has happened with this asshattery thread would be acceptable. But as it is, I think the closure of comments to the post was unfair and makes you look incompetent and touchy. Hell, the existence of that thread AT ALL is downright stupid. It's nothing but flamebait and you have all been on this journal long enough to fucking well know it. So don't go pissing yourselves and all over everybody else just because you got flamed over it.

You'll probably delete this entry too, but I hope at least a few people get a chance to read it.

-------------

His rant was also rejected, presumably for for being too critical of the rules, too sarcastic, or too ranty. I bet he got his email around the same time I got mine--weeks after submitting it. I can only guess how many OTHER rants on the matter got baleeted as well for having illicit bunnies sarcasm, but I'm guessing there were a few. And then I woke up today to find THIS on my friend page:



AHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAAA!

I figured once the community became moderated, there would be nothing allowed through the censors, and the community would wither and die from lack of content. And I was right. I even totally predicted the whine community's collapse on the info page for elfwood_wank.

-------------

A Final Thought:

First they came for the off-topic, and I didn't speak up because I was not off-topic.

Then they came for the sarcastic, and I did not speak up because I was not sarcastic.

Then they came for the bunnies uncut image macros, and I did not speak up because I was not posting uncut image macros.

Then they came for those who criticized the rules, and I did not speak up because I was not a critic of the rules.

And finally they came for me, because I was so lame and toed the line so well that they couldn't get rid of me any other way.
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic
    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 13 comments